Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 VT 322 - In re Carter

In re Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
5
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably State v. Yoh (2006), Commonwealth v. Talbot (2005)

72 state decisions

340200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Kirby v. Illinois · Brewer v. Williams · Estelle v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact and, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The central question in determining whether a particular proceeding is a critical stage of the prosecution focuses on whether potential substantial prejudice to the [petitioner's] rights inheres in the ... confrontation and the ability of counsel to help avoid that prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To demonstrate prejudice, petitioner would need to show that it was likely that some jurors found that there were threats to the victim but not to her family while other jurors found just the opposite.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.