176 Wash. 365
29 P.2d 680
Decided February 14, 1934
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1934-02-14
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1934-02-14
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1972
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 (dissenting) — I dissent. When counsel for appellant stated to the trial court that only two grounds on which the motion for a new trial “would be urged to the court,” that definitely waived all others, including that of misconduct of counsel. The trial court could understand it in no other way. The cases cited in the majority opinion upon this question are not apt.
¶2 The judgment should be affirmed.
¶3 Millard and Steihert, JJ., concur with Holcomb, J.