Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 WASH2D 441 - State v. Beskurt

State v. Beskurt’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · Neder v. United States · Waller v. Georgia · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he questionnaires were completed prior to voir dire and utilized by the attorneys as a “screening tool.” This facilitated the process by helping the attorneys identify which venire members would be questioned individually in open court and what questions to ask, if any. During general and individual voir dire, the judge, prosecutor, and defense attorneys, including [defendant’s] counsel, questioned venire members in order to determine their ability to sit as an impartial juror. At most, the questionnaires provided the attorneys and court with a framework for that questioning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.