Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 176 Wis. 2d 205 - State v. Washington

176 Wis. 2d 205 - State v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably 201 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Bentley (1996), State v. Allen (2004)

50 state decisions

2001993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 92 Wis. 2d 797 - State v. MacHner · State v. Reppin · 70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State · 54 Wis. 2d 489 - Nelson v. State · 109 Wis. 2d 96 - State v. Walberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant who seeks to withdraw a guilty or nolo contendere plea carries the heavy burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that the trial court should permit the defendant to withdraw the plea to correct a 'manifest injustice.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] conclusory allegation of 'manifest injustice,' unsupported by any factual assertions”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “5) If trial counsel's failure to object to the breach at the time of sentencing constitutes a waiver of the issue, Mr. Toliver requests resentenc-ing on the grounds that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.