Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 A3D 632 - In re Emma S.

In re Emma S.’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Thomas H. · In re M.B. · In re Logan M. · In re Doris G. · Adoption of Isabelle T.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not required to address the extent of the Department's reunification efforts in its finding that [the parent] is unfit”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.