Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 ALA 72 - Wyman v. Walker

Wyman v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1929
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Woodrow v. Hawving · Brown v. Cockerell · Hess v. Rudder · Doe ex dem. Holt v. Adams · Taylor v. Fomby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no evidence between O. and B. for the establishment of a dividing line. It is clear that B. held the land in controversy for many years beyond that necessary to effect a bar, honestly believing that the fence row was the dividing line, and that it belonged to him; but his testimony leaves no doubt that he never intended to claim any land in section 4, and held possession and claimed it, believing that it was in section 5, and contained in his deed, and that if he had known it was not in section 5 he would not have claimed it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.