Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Ariz. 201 - State v. Evans

State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2011

20 state decisions

120199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · United States v. Calandra · Weeks v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is repugnant to the principles of a free society that a person should ever be taken into police custody because of a computer error precipitated by government carelessness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`support the distinction drawn ... between clerical errors committed by law enforcement personnel and similar mistakes by court employees,' and that `even assuming ... that responsibility for the error rested with the justice court, it does not follow that the exclusionary rule should be inapplicable to these facts.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[e]ven assuming that deterrence is the principal reason for application of the exclusionary rule, we disagree with the court of appeals that such a purpose would not be served where carelessness by a court clerk results in an unlawful arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.