State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Stotts · State v. Williams · State v. Watkins · State v. Gomez · 23 Ariz. App. 345 - State v. Heasley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f an order is important enough to warrant a revocation petition, the order first must be reduced to writing and given to probationer, as is clearly contemplated by Rule 27.7(c)(2).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We do not believe that the disposition made after a finding of violation should determine whether the violation was properly found in the first instance. The clear intent of the rule is that oral terms and conditions shall not be the basis for revocation proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“for violation of a condition or regulation of which the probationer has not received a written copy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Korzuch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.