Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Ark. 52 - Simms v. Rolfe

Simms v. Rolfe’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1972
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1972

6 state decisions

20192819301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Halliburton v. Brinkley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The abbreviation `RR' is not an abbreviation commonly used to designate government subdivisions. Government surveys were not made with reference to railroads. The abbreviation `RR' does not necessarily convey the meaning of railroad to one of only ordinary experience in land titles . . . the letters could have reference to Ridge Road or River Road. It might refer to any natural or artificial monument where such letters were used in spelling the monument in mind.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The letter “R” or “r” is the proper abbreviation for range within the meaning of government surveys when used with reference thereto. When used otherwise in an attempted description of land, it means nothing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.