Wright v. Loaiza’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably 113 Cal. App. 2d 207 - County of Los Angeles v. Continental Corp. (1952), Hansen v. Burford (1931)
3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Meeker v. . Claghorn · Byington v. Simpson · 26 Cal. App. 246 - Mercantile Trust Co. of S.F. v. Doe · Dyer v. Swift · Foster v. . Persch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“detailed statement, kept in a book, in the nature of debit and credit,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.