177 Cal. App. 2d 776 - Richards v. Hillside Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2003
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 37 Cal. 2d 174 - Schumm v. Berg · 23 Cal. App. 2d 690 - Hays v. Temple · Pierce v. Merrill · 47 Cal. App. 2d 634 - Wells v. California Tomato Juice, Inc. · 3 Cal. App. 145 - Hughes Brothers v. Hoover
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ (a) No lien provided for in this chapter binds any property for a longer period than 90 days after the same has been filed except as hereinafter provided, unless within that time, proceedings to enforce the same be commenced in a proper court. ... If a credit be given and notice of the fact and terms of such credit be filed in the office of the county recorder subsequent to the filing of such lien and prior to the expiration of said 90-day period, then such lien continues in force until 90 days after the expiration of such credit, . . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dorer v. McKinzey““ ‘No lien provided for in this chapter [Liens of Mechanics, Builders and Materialmen] binds any property for a longer period than 90 days after the same has been filed . . . , unless within that time, proceedings to enforce the same be commenced in a proper court. . . . ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.