Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 CALAPP4TH 92 - People v. Shaw

People v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stogner v. California · 12 Cal. 4th 145 - People v. Coronado · 29 Cal. 4th 228 - Cooley v. Superior Court · 1 Cal. 3d 855 - Nino v. Gladys R. · 53 Cal. 3d 467 - People v. Bouzas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. The defendant engaged in conduct directed at a child; “2. A normal person, without hesitation, would have been disturbed, irritated, offended, or injured by the defendant’s conduct; “3. The defendant’s conduct was motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest in the child. . . .” (CALCRIM No. 1122, italics added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.