Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

177 F.2d 204

Docket No. 10841.

Ratterman v. Commissioner

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 20, 1949.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-10-20

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1966

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-10-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1L. F. Ratterman, Fred Ratterman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioners.

¶2Theron L. Caudle, Chas. Oliphant, John W. Smith, Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott, Maryhelen Wigle,' Irving I. Axelrad, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

¶3Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause came on to be heard upon the record and upon the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys for the parties; and it appearing to this court that the United States Tax Court found the facts in accordance with the evidence adduced, and in its carefully considered opinion correctly applied appropriate law to the facts found upon each of the items in controversy, the three decisions entered simultaneously on September 30, 1948, are affirmed.

/177/f2d/204 · .json · Public domain