Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 F.2d 427 - Strachman v. Palmer

Strachman v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis

177 F.2d 427 · 1949

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2006 · most notably United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs (1966), Hagans v. Lavine (1974)

42 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions

4201949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 41

Relies on Bell v. Hood · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Hurn v. Oursler · Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(f)ederal courts should not be overeager to hold on to the determination of issues that might be more appropriately left to settlement in state court litigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘first, is the carrier’s operation such as to bring the carrier within the general coverage of the Interstate Commerce Act; second, is the direction of the movement of the specific shipment in question from a point in the United States to a point either in the United States or in an adjacent country.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action asserting a claim of unfair competition when joined with a substantial and related claim under the copyright, patent or trade-mark laws.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.