Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 F.2d 478 - Prose v. Davis

Prose v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

177 F.2d 478 · 1949

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
December 1972
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 1972

10 federal appellate ·

1201949195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Bradley v. United States · Mitchell v. United States · Roberts v. United States · Collins v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Variously stated, many courts have adopted the rule that in eases involving change of beneficiary in military service insurance policies they will brush aside legal technicalities in order to effectuate the manifest intent of the insured, and if the insured has expressed an intention to change the beneficiary originally named in his policy and done an affirmative act to effectuate the change, leaving only ministerial acts to be performed by the insurer, they will treat as done that which should have been done and give effect to his intent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.