177 F.2d 513
Docket No. 8, Docket 21239.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-11-16
2 counsel of record
Relies on Bullard v. United States
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-11-16
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Greene v. United States (1994), King Enterprises, Inc. v. United States (1969)
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Amen, Bushnell & Butler, New York City, Russell Hardy, Washington, D. C., William J. Butler, New York City, for petitioners.
¶2Charles Oliphant, Theron L. Caudle, Washington, D. C., Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott, Maryhelen Wig'c, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, for respondent.
¶3Before L. HAND, SWAN and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
¶5Affirmed upon the point that there was no identifiable loss in the year 1941, on authority of Bullard v. United States of America, 2 Cir., 146 F.2d 386.