Watkins v. Woods’s Empirical Analysis
177 F.2d 516 · 1949
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on In re Recommendation of Local Advisory Board · In re Recommendation of Norfolk Local Advisory Board · In re Recommendation of Local Advisory Board for Oklahoma County in Oklahoma City Defense Rental Area · In re Recommendation of Local Advisory Board for Miami Defense-Rental Area
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to reconsider the evidence now in the record, together with such additional evidence as it may deem it appropriate to receive at a further hearing, if in its discretion it should decide to hold one within the next thirty days, and to make such findings of fact relating to the matter of an increase in maximum rents as the relevant and credible evidence, or lack of it, may justify, and thereupon to make an appropriate recommendation with respect thereto, in lieu of the recommendation which we have today disapproved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is not of sufficient weight to justify such recommendation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.