McGrath v. Zander’s Empirical Analysis
177 F.2d 649 · 1949
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 17 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1974 · most notably Guessefeldt v. McGrath (1952), National Savings & Trust Co. v. Brownell (1955)
36 federal appellate · 17 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1009
Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Williams v. State of North Carolina · Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch · Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp. · Cheever v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We recur then to the decisive question. Was appellee ‘resident within’ Germany ? If so, she became an enemy under Section 9(a) and would not be entitled to recover. The crucial term ‘resident within’ has been interpreted in [citations] and Sarthou v. Clark, D.C.S.D.Cal. 1948/ 78 F.Supp. 139, 142 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * ‘resident within the territory’ as employed in the Act connotes something different from and more than living within the specified areas. It is rather indicative of a settled and permanent place of abode, volitionally acquired and voluntarily assumed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“sections 9(a) and 32(a) are independent and exclusive of each other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Legerlotz v. Rogers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.