Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

177 F.2d 717

Docket No. 5968.

Berman v. Swenson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 7, 1949.

Decided Nov. 8, 1949.

Writ of Certiorari Denied Jan. 16, 1950.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-11-08

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 1962 · most notably Ramsey v. Hand (1962), Harris v. Swenson (1952)

25 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Edmondson v. Swenson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-11-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1See 70 S.Ct. 425.

¶2*718Louis Berman, pro se.

¶3Kenneth C. Proctor, Assistant Attorney General of Maryland (Hall Hammond, Attorney General of Maryland, on the brief), for appellee.

¶4Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6This is an appeal from an order refusing to issue a writ of habeas corpus on the application of a prisoner incarcerated under the judgment of a Maryland State Court. Although it appears that the prisoner has made application to many Maryland judges which have been denied, it does not appear that he has exhausted his remedies under the state law. The application was, therefore, properly denied, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. It appears, also, that there is no certificate of probable cause as required by statute. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253. The appeal must therefore be dismissed. Edmondson v. Swenson, Warden, 4 Cir., 165 F.2d 432.

¶7Appeal dismissed.

/177/f2d/717 · .json · Public domain