In re Carter’s Empirical Analysis
177 F.2d 75 · 1949
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 1996 · most notably Smith v. Keator (1974), In re Carter (1951)
16 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashbacker Radio Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission · Federal Communications Commission v. National Broadcasting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * when an authorization to engage in the bonding business has been approved by the District Court and is outstanding, it can be revoked, prior to the expiration of its term, only upon a proceeding which contains the elements of due process of law, i. e., a hearing and revelation of all data upon which a decision is to be based.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Carter““It may be true that the grant of authority to engage in the bonding business is an administrative act. But the deprivation of that right, once granted, is a judicial act, requiring due process of law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Carter““ * * * Carter had an authorization. He was engaged in business. The action of the court was not to deny him something he was seeking; it was to deprive him of something which' he had.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Carter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.