Anderson v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis
177 F.2d 770 · 1949
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1990
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1476 · 10 U.S.C. § 1511 · 10 U.S.C. § 1564
Relies on Bozza v. United States · Stout v. Hancock · Correll v. North Carolina · Hinchliffe v. Texas Co. · Brown v. Hunter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is sufficient if two-thirds or more ... concur in the conviction and three-fourths or more concur in the sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dodson v. Zelez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.