Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 F.2d 928 - Janes v. Sackman Bros.

Janes v. Sackman Bros.’s Empirical Analysis

177 F.2d 928 · 1949

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
February 1982
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 1982 · most notably Bournias v. Atlantic Maritime Co. (1955), 148 Ind. App. 203 - Horvath v. Davidson (1970)

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

16019491950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Propper v. Clark · Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co. · Whitford v. . the Panama Railroad Company · Cooper v. American Airlines, Inc. · Wiener v. Specific Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is obvious that the necessities of decision have forced upon us the rather delicate task of interpreting a state statute to carry out what seems to us the statutory purpose in a situation not yet visualized in the home precedents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.