Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

177 F.2d 965

Docket No. 22, Docket 21349.

Waterman v. Nelson

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 2, 1949.

Decided Nov. 17, 1949.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1949-11-17

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1966

11 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Gregoire v. Biddle

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1949-11-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Corinne C. Waterman, pro se.

¶2John F. Ryan, New York City, John F. X. McGohey, New York City, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, argued for defendant-appellees.

¶3Before L. HAND, Chief Judge and SWAN and FRANK, Circuit Judges. ■

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5 The claim against the defendant, Rossell, is only for damages as he has no authority to reinstate the plaintiff in the Veterans Administration; and, as a claim for damages, it is invalid under our recent decision-in Gregoire v. Biddle, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 579. Rossell appeared only for himself, -and none of the other defendants have been served, nor have they appeared, or asked for any relief. The action was, however, commenced against all the defendants by the filing of the complaint—Rule 3— and we know of nothing in the general rules which would justify the district court, sua sponte, in dismissing it. It is true that Rule 30 of the General Rules for the *966Southern District of New York, which we quote in the margin,* provides for its dismissal if no step has been taken in an action for a year; but, since the complaint has not been dismissed under that rule, it must be allowed to stand upon the files of the district court, awaiting any further action.

¶6Judgment affirmed as to Rossell.

¶7Judgment reversed as to the other defendants.

/177/f2d/965 · .json · Public domain