Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 F.3d 1113 - United States v. Montero-Camargo

United States v. Montero-Camargo’s Empirical Analysis

177 F.3d 1113 · 1999

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
March 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2011

9 federal appellate ·

120199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Sokolow · Berkemer v. McCarty · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`a reasonable innocent person in such circumstances would conclude that after brief questioning he or she would not be free to leave. '”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “about their citizenship and immigration status, and . . . may ask them to explain suspicious circumstances . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.