Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 F.3d 1233 - Bishop v. Avera

Bishop v. Avera’s Empirical Analysis

177 F.3d 1233 · 1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
March 2012
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2012

3 federal appellate ·

80199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Patterson v. McLean Credit Union · Behrens v. Pelletier · Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Supreme Court decision in Patterson [v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164 , 109 S.Ct. 2363 , 105 L.Ed.2d 132 (1989)] is arguably on point. In that ease, the Court found that Patterson, who appears to be an at-will employee, fell within § 1981’s protection. See Patterson, 491 U.S. at 185 , 109 S.Ct. 2363 , 105 L.Ed.2d 132 . However, in light of the subsequent division in lower courts, we cannot say that Patterson so clearly established the law as to strip Avera [Plaintiffs supervisor] of qualified immunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “clearly unlawful in light of the pre-existing law governing claims under § 1981,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.