Harper v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
177 F.3d 567 · 1999
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2011
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Rees v. Peyton · United States v. Partin · Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance · Franklin ex rel. Berry v. Francis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘Once [his] competence was put in issue, [the defendant] could not waive his right to have his competence determined.’ ”) (quoting Harper v. Parker, 177 F.3d 567 , 571 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1141 , 119 S.Ct. 2015 , 143 L.Ed.2d 1029 (1999) (first alteration in original)); Horace v. Wainwright, 781 F.2d 1558 , 1563 (11th Cir.) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.