In Re P.r.t.c., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Su v. C Su, In re Raejean Bonham (2000)
20 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Fondiller v. Robertson · United States v. Gay · Brady v. Andrew · Briggs v. Kent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“directly and adversely affected pecuniarily”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if a creditor is pursuing interests common to all creditors or is appointed for purposes of enforcement of the plan [of reorganization], he may exercise the trustee's avoidance powers.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re: Cybergenics Corporation, Debtor the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Cybergenics Corporation, on Behalf of Cybergenics Corporation, Debtor in Possession v. Scott Chinery L&s Research Corporation First Union National Bank of North Carolina Banque Indosuez Sunamerica Life Insurance Company Lincolnshire Management Inc Lincolnshire Equity Fund, L.P · Claridge Assocs., LLC v. Schepis (In re Pursuit Capital Mgmt., LLC)“To prevent unreasonable delay, courts have created an additional prudential standing requirement in bankruptcy cases: The appellant must be a 'person aggrieved’ by the bankruptcy court’s order.” (emphasis added)); see also C.W. Mining Co. v. Aquila, Inc. (In re C.W. Mining Co.), 636 F.3d 1257 , 1260 & n. 5 (10th Cir.2011) (noting that standing is”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.