177 Ind. App. 696 - Raymer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 1986
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Patterson v. State · Pulliam v. State · Luckett v. State · Newman v. State · Coleman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]t is within the sound discretion of the trial court to permit a witness to testify during rebuttal regarding a matter which is not in rebuttal but is related to the State’s case in chief, and the irregularity in so doing will not be treated as reversible error unless the defendant was prevented from presenting rebuttal evidence thereto.” (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wash v. State“`the fact finding body should have before it all the relevant circumstances that caused or induced such witness to testify, including the rewards for such testimony.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Aikins v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.