In Re Rutledge’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1963
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Miller · Howard v. Hoskins · Robinson v. Ragen · State v. Pyle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . under the rule laid down in our decisions, which it may be stated we are not disposed to broaden in view of the adequate remedies afforded persons convicted of crimes under our comprehensive codes of civil and criminal procedure, none of the points urged by appellant in his application is of the character required to warrant the granting of a writ of error coram nobis.” (p. 134.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Chance““Although the common law writ of error coram nobis has not been specifically abolished in this state there remain few, if any, grounds for invoking it, in view of the broad remedies now provided by our comprehensive codes of civil and criminal procedure.” (p. 133.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Chance
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.