Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Kan. 438 - Force v. Bates

Force v. Bates’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1992

2 district · 12 state decisions

8019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitaker v. Douglas · Staab v. Staab · Southard v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n · Pratt v. Barnard · Deming v. Douglass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A demurrer cannot serve to bring additional facts into a petition which might constitute a defense thereto. In ruling on a demurrer to a petition a court is not justified in reaching out and making additional facts a part of the petition. The inquiry is to be limited to the allegations themselves.” (Syl. IT 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.