Lux v. Rodrigues’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedLux v. Judd (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Meyer v. Grant · Victoria Buckley, Secretary of State of Colorado, v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc. · OHIO CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBLE ENERGY, INC. v. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Et Al. · COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIANA Et Al. v. WHITCOMB, GOVERNOR OF INDIANA, Et Al. · Libertarian Party v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n injunction is appropriate only if (1) it is necessary or appropriate in aid of our jurisdiction, and (2) the legal rights at issue are indisputably clear.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'does not simply suspend judicial alteration of the status quo but grants judicial intervention that has been withheld by lower courts'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ccordingly, ... it cannot be said that his right to relief is 'indisputably clear'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.