State v. Cripps’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2001 · most notably State v. Lenihan (1979), 26 Cal. 3d 334 - People v. Chavez (1980)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Chambers v. Maroney · California v. Green · United States v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... At any rate, defendants never objected to Wicks' testifying to the Peterson statement nor did they move to strike it from the record. They may not now object to its introduction." State v. Cripps (1978), Mont., 582 P.2d 312, 317 , 35 St.Rep. 967 , 972.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Owens · State v. Owens““In Turner the defendant was arrested for D.W.I. While a police officer was driving defendant’s vehicle to the police station, he became aware of a beer bottle on the floor of the car. When he leaned over to pick it up, he noticed a bag of marijuana lying near the beer bottle. This Court held that. . . the marijuana was admissible . . . In Turner the police officer was legitimately inside defendant’s car to begin with. His discovery of the beer bottle and subsequent discovery of the marijuana was not because of an intent on his part to search the vehicle. Under the circumstances, what the officer did in Turner was reasonable; here it was not.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Romero“It is well settled that law enforcement officers may make a full body search pursuant to a lawful arrest for purposes of protecting themselves or seizing evidence of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ulrich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.