Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 N.C. App. 122 - State v. Johnson

177 N.C. App. 122 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Ross · Florida v. Jimeno · Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. · United States v. Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, the Fourth Amendment and article I, § 20 of the North Carolina Constitution require issuance of a warrant based on probable cause for searches. However, our courts recognize an exception to this rule when the search is based on the consent of the detainee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The standard for measuring the scope of a suspect's consent under the Fourth Amendment is that of `objective' reasonableness — what would the typical reasonable person have understood by the exchange between the officer and the suspect?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`When an individual gives a general statement of consent without express limitations, the scope of a permissible search is not limitless. Rather it is constrained by the bounds of reasonableness[.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.