177 N.C. App. 225 - State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Creech v. Melnik · State v. Handy · United States v. Wood · 109 N.C. App. 105 - State v. Marshburn · State v. Meyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[1] whether the defendant has asserted legal innocence, [2] the strength of the State's proffer of evidence, [3] the length of time between entry of the guilty plea and the desire to change it ... [4] whether the accused has had competent counsel at all relevant times[,][5][m]isunderstanding of the consequences of a guilty plea, [6] hasty entry, [7] confusion, and [8] coercion.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“The sentencing judge may reduce the fine, or impose a prison term less than the applicable minimum prison term provided by this subsection, or suspend the prison term imposed and place a person on probation when such person has, to the best of his knowledge, provided substantial assistance in the identification, arrest, or conviction of any accomplices, accessories, co-conspirators, or principals if the sentencing judge enters in the record a finding that the person to be sentenced has rendered such substantial assistance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This Court has held that whether a trial court finds that a criminal defendant's aid amounts to 'substantial assistance' is discretionary. The reduction of the sentence is also in the judge's discretion, even if the judge finds substantial assistance was given.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.