177 N.C. App. 277 - Carson v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 92 N.C. App. 370 - McLeod v. Faust · 146 N.C. App. 600 - Collins v. Talley · 6 N.C. App. 628 - State v. Wooten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant’s request [to settle the record on appeal] was improper because a party may only request the trial court “settle the record on appeal” if that party “contends that materials proposed for inclusion in the record or for filing therewith . . . were not filed, served, submitted for consideration, admitted, or made the subject of an offer of proof....” [N.C.R. App. P. 11(c).] None of these contentions were made by either defendant or plaintiff and thus review by the trial court would have been improper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.