177 N.C. App. 54 - State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · State v. Coffey · Andreas v. United States · State v. Wallace · State v. Sturdivant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] defendant is prejudiced by errors relating to rights arising other than under the Constitution of the United States when there is a reasonable possibility that, had the error in question not been committed, a different result would have been reached at the trial out of which the appeal arises. The burden of showing such prejudice under this subsection is upon the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether a reasonable possibility exists that the evidence, if excluded, would have altered the result of the trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.