Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 N.C. App. 654 - Formyduval v. Britt

177 N.C. App. 654 - Formyduval v. Britt’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 85 N.C. App. 669 - Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North Carolina · State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Edmisten · Rorrer v. Cooke · 85 N.C. App. 338 - Dixon v. Stuart · 134 N.C. App. 217 - Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. Tomlinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A plaintiff in a legal malpractice action must establish that the loss would not have occurred but for the attorney’s conduct. A plaintiff must prove: (1) The original claim was valid; (2) It would have resulted in a judgment in his favor; and (3) The judgment would have been collectible. A plaintiff alleging a legal malpractice action must prove a case within a case, meaning a showing of the viability and likelihood of success of the underlying action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.