State v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2020
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Domby v. United States · State v. Reyes · State v. Covell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[l]uring or [e]nticing a [c]hild by attempting, via electronic or any other means to lure or entice a child . . . into a motor vehicle, structure, or isolated area, or to meet or appear at any other place, with a purpose to commit a criminal offense with or against the child.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`close a gap between criminal charges of attempted kidnapping and the lesser offense of harassment for those instances in which a person unsuccessfully tries to lure a child ... with a criminal purpose.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in sexual conduct which would impair or debauch the morals of the child, or who causes the child harm that would make the child an abused or neglected child....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.