Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Ohio App. 3d 171 - State v. Hill

177 Ohio App. 3d 171 - State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024 · most notably Shoop v. Hill (2019), People v. Skinner (2018)

4 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

140200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Ashe v. Swenson · Ring v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he American Psychiatric Association's definition of mental retardation identified the following categories of adaptive skills: communication; self-care; home living; social/interpersonal skills; use of community resources; self-direction; functional academic skills; work; leisure; health; and safety. In 2002, the American Association on Mental Retardation [”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e reject the argument that the Apprendi / Ring line of cases requires the issue of an offender's mental retardation to be decided by a jury under a reasonable-doubt standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]pplication of the doctrine of res judicata/collateral estoppel to a particular issue is a question of law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.