Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Ohio App. 3d 239 - State v. Dunfee

177 Ohio App. 3d 239 - State v. Dunfee’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2020

7 state decisions

40200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “R.C. 2909.05 (B)(1)(b) does not limit the ownership of property that is subject to its terms. Rather, the only limitation is based on the use of the property. We find nothing in R.C. 2909.05 which precludes a prosecution under R.C. 2909.05 (B)(1)(b) when the property at issue is governmental property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[n]o person shall knowingly cause serious physical harm to property that is owned, leased, or controlled by a governmental entity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “profession, business, trade, or occupation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.