Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Ohio App. 3d 262 - Blair v. McDonagh

177 Ohio App. 3d 262 - Blair v. McDonagh’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
4
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Prince George's County v. Longtin (2011), Eysoldt v. ProScan Imaging (2011)

69 state decisions

650200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell · Goldfuss v. Davidson · Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Actual malice, necessary for an award of punitive damages, is (1) that state of mind under which a person's conduct is characterized by hatred, ill will or a spirit of revenge, or (2) a conscious disregard for the rights and safety of other persons that has a great probability of causing substantial harm.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. McConnell v. Bare Label Prods., Inc.
  2. “Judgments supported by some competent, credible evidence going to all the essential elements of the case will not be reversed by a reviewing court as being against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Canfield Motor Sports, Inc. v. Motorist Mut. Ins. Co.
  3. “inquiry * * * involves whether the trial court's judgment was against the manifest weight of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Canfield Motor Sports, Inc. v. Motorist Mut. Ins. Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.