177 Ohio App. 3d 865 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) Except as provided in division (F)(2) of this section , the duties to provide the notices described in divisions (A) and (C) of this section apply regarding any offender or delinquent child who is in any of the following categories: {¶ 12} "(a) The offender is a tier III sex offender * * *. {¶ 13} "(2) The notification provisions of this section do not apply to a person described in division (F)(1)(a), (b), or (c) of this section if a court finds at a hearing after considering the factors described in this division that the person would not be subject to the notification provisions of this section that were in the version of this section that existed immediately prior to the effective date of this amendment. * * *.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Stockman, L-08-1077 (1-23-2009)

2. “Ohio's previous sex-offender designations were replaced by a three-tiered classification scheme.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re C. S., 08ca0050 (3-23-2009)