Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

177 Okla. 43

55 P.2d 953

French v. Bragg

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1936

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1936-03-17

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1936-03-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 1951

17 state decisions

90193619401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER OURIAM.

¶1 This is an appeal from an order of the court refusing to vacate an order confirming sale. On the 18th day of February, 19-36, defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss upon jurisdictional grounds. We have examined the authorities cited by the movant herein, and they reasonably sustain the proposition urged by the defendant in error that the appeal was not perfected by due and proper service and settlement of the case-made. Upon such examination we called for response on the part of the plaintiff in error, to which order of the court the plaintiff in error has not seen fit to reply.

¶2 It appearing by an examination of the authorities that the failure of jurisdiction as alleged by the defendant in error is reasonably apparent, it is not the duty of this court to search for some theory upon which to sustain the jurisdiction to hear the cause.

¶3 The appeal is therefore dismissed.

McNEILL, O. j., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. OSBORN, V. C. J., and WELCH and PHELPS, JJ., absent.
/177/okla/43 · .json · Public domain