Furst v. Lucas’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Colgate & Co. · Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. · Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co. · United States v. A. Schrader's Son, Inc. · City of Sapulpa v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The declarations of law as contained in the decisions of this court previously mentioned rested upon consideration of the then existing expressions of the federal courts upon the subject. There have been, however, some important treatmfents otf this subject by the United States Supreme Court which have not been taken into consideration in our previous opinions. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. Belcher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.