177 Or. App. 373 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a person is a danger to others as a result of [her] `condition at the time of the hearing as understood in the context of [her] history.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“`Fact matching' in these kinds of cases is often of little utility because every involuntary mental commitment case must be decided on its individual facts under the applicable standards.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]e have found generally that where a mentally ill person has threatened and has committed overt violent acts against others in the past, the clear and convincing evidence standard is met.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.