Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

177 So. 2d 253

Goswick v. Mittelman

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1965-07-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1966

1 state decisions

Relies on Hardcastle v. Mobley · Benitez v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-07-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant urges the insufficiency of the proof upon the entry of a summary final *254decree of foreclosure. An examination of the record reveals that the appellant, as defendant, filed no answer other than a general denial and offered no affidavit or other type of proof at the hearing on the motion. The plaintiff, appellee, offered sworn testimony sufficient to establish a prima facie case. Under these circumstances, the chancellor properly entered the summary decree appealed. See Hardcastle v. Mobley, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 715; Kelly v. Patek, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 520.

¶2Affirmed.

/177/so2d/253 · .json · Public domain