Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

177 So. 2d 63

McCarthy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1965-06-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1967

1 state decisions

Relies on Sampson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-06-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court properly denied appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, where the record shows testimony was taken after defendant’s guilty plea, and defendant now contends in his motion that the court failed to take testimony to determine the degree of the crime charged pursuant to § 909.11 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See: Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771.

¶2Affirmed.

/177/so2d/63 · .json · Public domain