Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 SO3D 64 - Lewis v. State

Lewis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 884 So. 2d 1058 - Davis v. State · Whitehead v. State · Arnett v. State · 935 So. 2d 1240 - Daniel v. State · Lee v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... IVORY LEE ROBINSON, in Alachua County, Florida, on or about May 26, 2002, unlawfully and by an act imminently dangerous to another, and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life, but without a premediated design to effect the death of any particular person, did attempt to kill and murder WILLIAM FRANK MABREY, by shooting William Frank Mabrey, a human being, with a firearm and/or IVORY LEE ROBINSON did unlawfully commit a battery upon WILLIAM FRANK MABREY by actually and intentionally touching or striking said person against said person’s will, or causing bodily harm to WILLIAM FRANK MABREY and in the commission of said battery did use a deadly weapon, to-wit: .357 Llama Comanche Stoger Industries Revolver Serial Number S830231, and in the course or commission of said offenses, Ivory Lee Robinson did discharge a firearm; to wit; 357 Llama Comanche Stoger Industries Revolver. Serial Number S83023; and as a result of the discharge of said firearm, Ivory Lee Robinson did cause an injury to WILLIAM FRANK MA-BREY, in violation of Section 775.087, Florida Statutes, Section 784.045(1)(a)(2), and Section 782.04(2), Florida Statutes. (L10) COUNT II: ... IVORY LEE ROBINSON, in Alachua County, Florida, on or about May 26, 2002, having been convicted of a felony in the courts of this state or of a crime against the United States of America which .is. designated as a felony or convicted of an offense in another state, territory or country punishable by imprisonment for a term e”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.