Harris v. Shear’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1976
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 1 E.H. Smith 124 - Kountze v. . Kennedy · Watson v. Baker · Seale v. Baker · Bullitt v. Farrar · 21 Tex. Civ. App. 109 - McCord-collins Commerce Co. v. Levi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the statement is a matter susceptible of actual knowledge, and he makes it recklessly, without any knowledge of its truth or falsity, and in the form of _ a positive assertion, calculated to convey the impression that he knows it to be true, the representation is equally fraudulent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Benham v. Tipton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.