Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Wash. 442 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably 87 Wash. 2d 829 - State v. Kroll (1976), Leach v. State (1944)

26 state decisions

801934194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Clark · Mattson v. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co. · State v. Craig · State v. Schneider · State v. Stratton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Temporary insanity, that is to say, the mental excitement or frenzy produced by immoderate drinking, does not exempt from responsibility where the accused voluntarily became intoxicated, although by statute in some states it may be considered in mitigation of the penalty. This is merely another way of stating the general rule that voluntary drunkenness is no excuse. On the other hand, however, long continued habits of intemperance producing permanent mental disease amounting to insanity, or so weakening and impairing the mind that one committing an offense has not mind enough at the time to know right from wrong, relieves him from responsibility under the law, the same as insanity arising from other causes.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.